Tuesday, October 18, 2016

Wiring up your own foot pedal.


While working on my practice amp, I was looking around on the amzfx Lab Notebook pages and came across a section on low-voltage preamp circuit.  Towards the end, Jack Orman shares a fully-developed two-stage overdrive circuit.  With my bass project in mind, I put one together on my breadboard.


With the exception of two parts values, I built it as described and shown in the article.  It works the same way as the one I ended up with in my practice amplifier, with an NPN transistor stage pushing a JFET transistor stage.  It also has less parts and is powered by only 3 volts instead of nine.  As suggested in the write-up, my intent was to use a pair of NiMH AAA cells that should provide 900+ hours before needing a recharge.  So, what kind of sounds can you get out of so little?  As Jack wrote, "These low voltage boosters are not for making clean sounds but they excel in adding a bit of flavor. They will provide some additional tone colors for your musical palette..."  I was so impressed with this little circuit that I built a perf-board pedal version of it.


Biasing of the JFET is by means of a trim pot on the circuit board.


A small plastic junction box seemed like an appropriate way to house things.  The bypass switch is nestled between the drive and level-out pots, making for a compact set of controls.


It was a tight squeeze with all of the wires, but I left some extra length on the leads to make it easier to handle during the build and replacing batteries.


Some temporary labels came in handy during testing.


After passing initial testing, I added some lettering and sprayed on some clear coat.



3VOD is currently out on loan to a local musician who will provide some feedback on the sound and overall design...

Sunday, July 12, 2015


LeSpork Practice Amp - Testing 1,2,3

Maybe it would be fun
To get a new opinion
Get a little work done
And forget


I was spending a lot of time going up and down stairs working on that bass preamp circuit.  I'd build something on my breadboard at my kitchen table or at my desk where there is plenty of light, and then carry it to my son's room to test the circuit with the bass and amp.  The problem is, there isn't anywhere as much light in my son's room.  So, a lot of times, I'd make a few trips up and down the stairs with my test board until I had something that actually worked.  Good for exercise, but for productivity, not so much.

I got to emailing with a friend of mine, as he was starting a low-watt guitar amplifier and speaker cabinet build project.  One thing led to another, and I decided it was the right time to build a low-watt practice amplifier.  The thought was to have something that I could use in any part of the house for a quick test of a guitar electronics projects before bringing things all the way upstairs for a full test.  I had a pre-assembled 1/2 watt LM386 audio amplifier on hand, so most of what I needed to do was to add some speakers and a wooden box.  With that, the LeSpork Practice Amp, aka LPA, was born.


It took a couple of iterations to design the speaker cabinet.  It was a balance between common lumber sizes and dimensions that would work with the pair of 4" speakers I had picked out as well as the cabinet aesthetics.  Sometime back in high school, I first learned about Fibonacci numbers.  As applied to two dimensions, the Golden Rule ratio is 1 : 1.62.  For a box, the ratio of  0.62 : 1 : 1.62 for the sides is considered by some to be ideal.  This relationship is what I used for sizing my interior speaker cabinet dimensions.  I started with something wide enough for the two speakers side-by-side, then rounded the height and depth dimensions to the closest standard pre-cut lumber size.  Lastly, I worked out dimensions for the cabinet to sit at a slight angle to the floor, so that the speakers would end up pointing slightly upwards, making it easier to hear the sound from this little amp.


The next day, I headed off to the home improvements stores, hoping to find some 3/8 thick dimensional lumber to build a box with roughly 800 enclosed cubic inches and dimensions of 5.75x9.25x15.  The closest I found was some plywood and tongue-and-groove wainscot material.  I'll take gluing up tongue-and-groove pine boards over cutting plywood any day, so the decision for me was simple.


Adding a few pieces of square stock for cleats plus some nails and glue, the sides, top and bottom of the box came together within a few hours over a weekend.


I had a piece of oak veneer panel board on hand and cut a piece out to make the speaker baffle.  At only 3/16 thick, it would not support the screws for holding the speakers to it, so I added a pair of mounting "rings" of the same material.  They're actually mounting squares, chosen to accommodate the shape of the speaker frames.
I attached the speakers, input jack, amp circuit and a battery clip.  After adding some screws to hold the front and back panels on, I plugged in my Tele-esque LeSpork6 prototype guitar for a quick test.





Satisfied that things worked as expected, I built a grille panel from another piece of oak veneer panel board and some jute cloth.  It's a nice snug fit and the grille panel can be easily removed with a flat blade screwdriver or similar tool if I ever need to service the speakers.




While waiting for the clear coat to dry on the cabinet, I began focusing on the sound and circuitry.  I had built something like this for my son a few years ago, from an old 2-way bookshelf speaker and the same pre-assembled LM386 audio amplifier, and it sounded about the same as this one did.  The main problem was the amplifier circuit would distort when the volume control was at or above 3/4 of maximum volume.  Second, there was no tone control.  For this to be a useful guitar amplifier, I had to address both of these issues while getting as much volume out of it as possible.


The tone control was the simplest of these problems to solve.  I already had a Big Muff Pi tone circuit on my breadboard, so I put it in the signal path.  between the guitar and amplifier.  The addition of this passive circuit between the guitar and amp input jack almost took care of it all, as it cut the incoming signal strength.


There was just a little bit of distortion with the amp and guitar volume all the way up, but using my son's Epi LP Junior with a humbucker pickup resulted in too much distortion at higher guitar and amp volume settings.  What I needed was a preamp stage that would allow me to manage the gain as well as a way to reduce the signal level into the amp enough to keep from clipping the LM386.  That also meant the addition of control knobs to the cabinet.  That being the easier part of this build for me, I decided on the knob locations and spacing and came up with a way to mount the tone and gain control potentiometers.




Back to the gain and output issues, after some experimentation, I came upon a combination of two simple jfet circuits, an Alembic Stratoblaster Booster and a Fetzer Valve 1.1 Booster.



In order to optimize this circuit for a variety of guitar pickups, I found I could vary the value of  Rs=10k, between the J201 transistor Source and ground.  I found three particular fixed resistor values that worked well with single-wound pickups, humbucker pickups and active pickup on-board circuits typical in acoustic-electric guitars, that were also compatible with one setting on the 100k trim pot at the preamp output, setting the signal level into the LM386 amp.


The selector switch in the preamp circuit allowed choosing an overall gain range to match the guitar pickup output level, the B100k gain control potentiometer allowed for a gain adjustment that includes a tube-like overdriven effect at the upper range of the control, and the 100k trim pot kept the preamp output low enough to avoid clipping distortion in the LM386 amp.


I found a few things to maximize the volume of this little 1/2 watt power amplifier in the schematic notes and technical data for my power amp.  The notes indicated removing the on-board jumper would provide additional gain.  The datasheet also indicated this, and included instructions on adding a resistor at the jumper contacts would produce different levels of gain.  Unfortunately, taking off the jumper resulted in a large loss of volume as well as large reductions in the overdriven ranges.  Trying a 1k pot in place of the amp jumper also resulted in lower volume levels as well as reductions in overdriven ranges.  Switching the gain control from a B100k pot to a B50k, as drawn in the Alembic Stratoblaster circuit, provided a smoother set of gain ranges, but did nothing to allow for any more volume.  Seeing no other ways to optimize this circuit, I decided to set it aside for now and try some other preamp circuits with this 1/2 watt amp and speaker setup.


First up was the well-known LPB-1.  As I knew from another project, the LPB-1 has a lot more gain and a much brighter tone than the Fetzer Valve circuit.  I used a 2N5089 transistor, and instead of using the 830k/100k resistors shown here, I biased the transistor base with a 470k/47k voltage divider.  It rocked the socks off of the LPA but with too much gain for my taste, overdriving the LM386 amp except at a very low output level that was not loud enough to be useful in a clean mode.


Following a mod I found in a chat room, I added a a gain control made up of a 22uF cap and a B5k pot in series, parallel to the 330R emitter resistor, similar in configuration to the StratoBlaster circuit.  The gain control allowed for good clean and overdriven ranges, but had a noticeable surge in the higher end of the overdriven range.  This was easily fixed by swapping out the B5k to a B1k pot, resulting in a smaller but very usable clean gain range.  Although this circuit worked well, it was a bit too bright with this setup for my tastes.  Besides that, the inherent noise of the NPN transistor in this circuit was enough to make me continue searching for another circuit.

Since jfet preamp circuits typically have a warm tone than their NPN and PNP counterparts, I thought there might be a way to use a jfet stage to take the edge off of the LPB-1.  Feeding the output of a Fetzer Valve stage through a trim pot into the LPB-1 yielded some nice tone, so I replaced the first stage trim pot with a B100k potentiometer.  After turning through a rather large clean range, the upper range of this control allowed the first stage to overdrive the second stage.  Turning up the drive control all the way allowed for using the guitar volume as a gain control with a very small clean range, as well as a HUGE amount of sustain with the upper end of the guitar volume control. But, this came at the cost of some muddiness in the harmonics that detracted from the overdriven sound.


Finally, I swapped the two preamp stages, putting the LPB-1 in front of the Fetzer Valve with the B100k drive control in the middle.  Knowing the gain of the NPN stage could easily overdrive the jfet stage, I was pleased at how well this combination worked.  With two stages of amplification in this preamp, I expected to have to keep the Fetzer Valve trim output very low to keep from overdriving the amp, and was pleased to find the power amp could handle the preamp output up to about half of its 100k range with a single pickup guitar.  I also found a good amount of usable Drive control settings that produced clean sounds when turning the guitar volume control down.  This left plenty of knob rotation on both the Drive control and guitar volume control for inducing a wide range of tasty jfet overdrive, all the way from mild after-buzz to all-out, long-sustaining, mega buzzing sounds, full of rich harmonics.  To my surprise, the humbucker on my son's LP Junior did not significantly alter the Drive control ranges or require me to reduce the output level into the amp.  This circuit even worked with the preamps on my acoustic-electrics.  Considering how versatile this setup was with just the three controls and without the need for a gain range selector switch, I settled on this preamp circuit for the LeSpork Practice Amp.  All that was left then was to solder the rest of the circuit to the board, bias the J201 transistor, reassemble the amp, add some insulation to the inside of the cabinet, and reattach the rear cabinet panel.







Wednesday, September 21, 2016

Bad the the bone foot pedals


Excited by my new discovery, I hurriedly finished my toilet trip and rushed outside to share this invaluable piece of information with my colleagues.
“I KNOW WHY THE ‘DO THE WEASEL STOMP’ IS CALLED THE ‘DO THE WEASEL STOMP’!” I blurted out to the boss, Steve.
Adorning the walls of the toilet was a poster for ‘The Mother Of Inventions’ album ‘Weasels Ripped My Flesh’ and I had worked it out. Of course as you're probably aware, The Mothers were lead by the one, the only, the totally (and tonally) mental genius Frank Zappa. One of Frank’s signature sounds was provided by the Systech Harmonic Energizer - a filter / wah that London based pedal makers Fredric Effects (FE) have recreated in their fantastic… yup you guessed it... ‘Do The Weasel Stomp’.
“See the thing is Steve they’ve called it that because of Frank Zappa and this album called...” I began to explain to my boss thinking to myself ‘that’s it, I’m a genius, I’ve solved the greatest mystery in guitar playing history, maybe they’ll give me the Nobel Peace Prize, maybe I’ll get to meet the prime minis...’

“Well, duh Jamie. I mean that's pretty obvious, plus it does say it on their website”.

Oh.

Well even if the boss already knew that fact, it got me thinking. See, I’m a huge fan of Fredric and their work, and they’re certainly a favourite with our customers as these hand built pedals have become one of our best selling ranges. Value for money without sacrificing tone, Fredric Effects should be in everyone's collection. Whether it’s the first timer just getting into the vast world of boutique pedals, or the experienced tone hound who know their FY­2’s from there FY­6’s there is a Fredric for everyone.

In part one of this blog I’m going take you through a few of these brilliant pedals.

Do The Weasel Stomp (DTWS) MKIIWhat is it?As I mentioned before the DTWS is Fredric’s recreation of the legendary Systech Harmonic Energizer - a very rare and weird box full of signature fuzzy wah goodness. FE have taken Zappa’s favourite toy and added a switchable fuzz circuit and totally independent gain controls. Pulling these out of the mix for a second, you get a super precise filter, however as you begin to dial in the gain you start getting some seriously unique lead tones, and when you start dialling in the fuzz you are launched into a universe of soaring oddball sounds. The DTWS is as versatile as it is odd, simply used for that cocked wah distortion sound, a bass / treble boost or turn everything up and get that throaty attack. FE have added an expression pedal jack, meaning you can take control of the frequency, turning the pedal into a wah.

Why should I buy one?Because its uniqueness and usability makes the DTWS a must have for all fans of fuzz / distortion. 
What's is it?Taking inspiration from the above DTWS, FE created this original 
stompbox, the Pocket Weasel. Not too dissimilar from the DTWS, the Pocket Weasel has a broader frequency range, from a piercing treble attack, through to a rumbling bass boost and stopping off on those ‘cocked wah’ style tones in between. The fuzz circuits boast a Germanium transistor gain stage making this a rougher tone that the DTWS.
Why should I buy one?The frequency range on the PW makes it a great pedal for all genres, creating unique lead tones that’ll follow across the deepest funk groove, the heaviest metal riff and anything in-between. 

What Is It?Fredric’s take on the legendary Green box Russian Muff, and boy is it great! There are countless clones of this pedal on the market, so what makes FE’s take one of the best? Well for me a mixture of things. This was one of the first FE pedals I tried and in all honesty all I was expecting was just another muff pedal. I certainly wasn’t expecting my socks to be blown off by a hand built pedal that cost so little, but after a short while with this little green box I found myself sans socks and grinning like a Cheshire cat. It does everything you want from a muff clone. The tone and sustain controls take you from dark and brooding to a snappy treble attack and every in between, it's perfect for screaming leads, beefy riffage and weighty rhythm. As for our four string bottom end brother and sisters, this is one pedal that feeds off of your bass and adds one hell of a punch without trashing your tone. As ever with FE pedals, the Green Russian is finished with some brilliant artwork, invoking thoughts of Soviet Russia’s military ­ A great nod to the original pedal and the rumour that they were built from old tanks. (They weren’t, sadly.)

Why should I buy one?Because you can’t afford not too. This is a serious Russian Muff clone that stands up tall next to pedals double its price. 
What is it?There are not many things I fear more in life than talking about Klon clones on the internet, take a look into the archive of any gear page and you’ll find a hot bed of opinions and arguments.

Maybe wasps. I really hate wasps.

Anyway, we’re going to (true) bypass all of that, and I’m just going to share with you my thoughts on FE’s transparent drive pedal. First things first, it is important to note that the Zombie Klone and Golden Eagle are the same pedal in different casings, giving you a choice between a more traditional gold pedal featuring an animal decal (I see what you did there) or a more modern blue / green finish featuring a horse­man­ centaur­zombie guy (I… kinda see what you did there). The King of Klone we’ll get to in a moment, but let’s get into the first two. So what can be said about ZK / GE? Well, it does exactly what you’d want from a transparent overdrive. Pop it in front of your amp and get knob twiddling. This pedal can add that little bit of gain to your chain and push your tone over the edge, or be your main overdrive sound, all the while retaining clarity.

Now the King of Klone (KOK) has a very simple but very effective difference to its singular brothers... its two Klon’s in one box! Two identical (both inside and outside of the box) sets of controls leading to two independent channel switches gives you tons to play with. A classic setup would be to dial channel A for your boost sound and channel B for your overdrive. Or turn them both at the same time and get screaming! A nifty B ­sized enclosure keeps the KOK pedal board friendly while giving you three awesome gain stages to play with.

Why should I buy one?This is a must have for all guitarist in my opinion. No pedal board should be without one. Hands down our best selling pedal here at VGB, we’ve the pleasure of sending all types of big names home with one of FE’s finest pedals.
What Is It?An ultra faithful clone of the Interfax Harmonic Percolator inside, with an updated modern shell and three super distinctive clipping setting on the outside,­ FD have bought one of the most sought after, rare oddball pedals back to life in a refreshing modern way. A pedal that was heavily favored by Steve Albini, This is not your average distortion pedal, oh no. It splats, clips, buzzes and makes all manner of wonderful left-field distortion noises. It’s got a whole lot of power too. Between the harmonics (input) and the balance (output), things get very loud and very weird VERY quickly. Fun fact: If you have this pedal cranked, you can sometimes pick up surrounding RF signals, old school circuits, old school interference. But don’t let that put you off this totally unique pedal. 
For me, it’s the three clipping settings FE have included. Position one is the vintage correct germanium transistor, two is no clipping (the loudest setting) and three reveals a softer silicon transistor. You’re basically given the option of 3 different and interesting distortions in one noisey box. A great pedal to build a one of kind sonic blueprint with.

Why should I buy one?
Bored of distortion? Had enough of sounding like every band on the bill? Wanna get weird and wonderful? Wanna lose yourself in exciting heavy tones full of splats and buzz and sonic awesomeness? Want a pedal that sounds like your brain after 10 gallons of coffee?

Yeah, get one of these.
What is it?The Utility Percolator isn’t too far from its noisier cousin the Harmonic Percolator. 
Less splutters and buzzes means it's a little bit less of a lunatic than the traditional HP, but still retains the uniqueness that you’d want from a percolator. All the controls remain the same on the outside of this box, but it's on the inside you’ll find the changes. Fredric have put in lower leakage German germanium transistors and a low pass filter making this a much more controllable version than the vintage correct HP.

Why should I buy one?Because it's like the Harmonic Percolator, but on decaf.

What is it?Okay,  I think we can all agree that this is a strong contender for the ‘best named pedal ever’ award, which I really hope is a real thing, and boy does this live up to its name. The SUC is a mean machine comprised of two legendary fuzzes, the Shin-Ei FY-2 Companion fuzz and the FY-6 Superfuzz, faithfully cloned to perfection by FE. This is a box of lush aggression, and it's the perfect pedal for that Jesus And Mary Chain wall of noise from the FY-2 side, and the added FY-6 opens up a rich fuzz attack that is perfect for adding a thick rhythmic punch to your tone.

Why should I buy it?If you’re looking for a total fuzz takeover, for the ability to create tones that invoke the darkest of brooding aggression through to the most nasal arrogant bites, while retaining an eerie sense of control and calm then this is the pedal you’ve been looking for.
Unpleasant Companion


As you may have guessed, the UC is a relative of the aforementioned SUC. Focusing on the harsh FY-2 FE have added an volume circuit, controlled by a smaller dial on the face of the pedal. This gives you all the vintage nasty fuzztones you could ever want, without facing the volume drop out that has been associated with these in the past and the smaller control makes sure you don’t accidentally knock the volume up to uncontrollable levels mid gig!

Why should I buy it?It’s mean, it’s nasty and it’s loud!

Tuesday, September 6, 2016

A New Vinyl Listening Experience

Inside Spiritland - London's new vinyl listening experience A guide to the custom-built Spiritland sound-system.

Tokyo may be the untouchable audiophile capital of the world, but when it comes to combining fine dining, drinks and state-of-the-art analogue sound, London is beginning to find its feet. 

 With several permanent and nomadic spaces now in operation, the art of slow listening is being rediscovered. After all, our experience of music, so denatured by laptop speakers and club PAs, is at stake. 

 One space leading the way is Spiritland, which has made the jump from sound system in residence at Merchants Tavern in Shoreditch to having its very own purpose built space in King’s Cross. With an enviable custom-built system manned by the city’s most respected selectors, a radio production studio and heavyweight Kuzma turntable in situ for album playbacks, Spiritland sounds as good as it looks. 

To give you a sense of the space, we asked owner Paul Noble to talk us through the specifics of the gear, why he’s no vinyl evangelist and what it means to finally listen to music as it was meant to be heard.

Wednesday, July 20, 2016

One of a kind Stratocaster

Have you ever found yourself staring blankly at your favorite Stratocaster?
Have you thought to yourself ‘I wonder what would happen if you crossed that with a Fabergé Egg?’
Well no, you probably haven’t, I mean who thinks that? No, no-one would ever think of crossing the Peter Carl Fabergé famed jewelled eggs with Leo Fender’s most popular guitar. Nobody apart from Fender senior master builder Yuriy Shishkov that is. The mind behind the 'Birdflower Telecaster’ - Yuriy cast his eyes on the iconic curves of the Stratocaster and thought just that.
"I thought that the timeless, simple yet elegant pattern design of a Fabergé Pine Cone Easter egg would look beautiful on the Stratocaster body. The guitar’s curves and flowing shape perfectly fit the rounded profile of the Faberge masterpiece.”
- Yuriy Shishkov
Thus the Pine Cone Stratocaster was born. Boasting 10ft of painstakingly hand inlaid 18-karat gold wire trellis along the fingerboard, 550 high grade diamonds and Pine Cone “scales" made of fine silver (and more gold, because why not?). All handworked to give the Strat it’s exquisitely detailed finish. This Fender is worthy of the Russian Tsars of old. The guitar is complemented by its own matching Fabergé Pine Cone Easter egg (containing a miniature Elephant, like the original, and with matching serial number), hand tooled blue leather strap and of course, fully lit display case.
Now, million pound question: is it any good? Well, Fender Custom Shop does hold a fearsome reputation, and rightly so. Underneath all the bling there’s a one piece maple body, the highest grade birdseye maple neck and NOS pickups hand wound by the legendary Abigail Ybarra, I think the answer is going to a resounding yes. It’s also worth mentioning that the routing of the body is unlike any other Strat past or present - allowing for more surface area on which Yuriy can apply the guitars hand-stained blue scales.
While this guitar has certainly polarised opinions here at VGB, it has to be said that the level of craftsmanship, skill and creativity shown by Yuriy is really of its own. Taking two worlds separated by over 100 years and combining them to create a truly dazzling work of art. This is a one in a million guitar.

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

What happened to "Oh Sherrie"?

The Girl in the Video: “Separate Ways (Worlds Apart)” (1983) and “Oh Sherrie” (1984)



The videos: “Separate Ways (Worlds Apart)” by Journey; “Oh Sherrie” by Steve Perry.

The girls-now-women: Margaret Oldsted Menendez (“Separate Ways”); Sherrie Swafford (“Oh Sherrie.”).


“Separate Ways (Worlds Apart)”


Of the people interviewed for (phase one of) this series, Margaret was the last person I contacted. Her video was not as front-of-mind as the others I am including, possibly because it predates when my family got cable. But in any case, I’m so glad I thought to look for her. She reported back: “My children said ‘You have to do this, mom!’”

And luckily, she took their advice.

How were you cast in the video for “Separate Ways (Worlds Apart)”?

I am from New Orleans where music and hospitality is part of our culture. The music scene was new wave and some punk rockers. During my high school and college days, I dated a cute musician, Chuck Menendez. It was his sister, who was in an infamous ‘80s New Orleans band called The Cold, who ultimately led me to the audition for the Journey video.

She was friends with the makeup artist in the production company. I got a call from Chuck because they hadn’t found anyone to cast for the girl part, and they wanted “his girlfriend” to come and audition. I must have been clueless; had I thought it through I probably wouldn’t have even shown up to the audition. I am relatively shy and quiet.



I was a college student at Tulane University in uptown New Orleans. I double majored in biology and environmental studies. I was working and paying my way through college so the [notion] of making money for shooting a video was a godsend. It paid $250 a day and I was paid for three days of work. That was a lot of money at the time for a student like me. So I was now the girl in the Journey video, still clueless.


What was it like making the video?

The first day on the wharf of the Mississippi River by the French Quarter was freezing. There were two Winnebagos, one for the band and another for production. Lots of people were hanging in the production RV. Everyone was friendly, saying Beverly Hillbillies lines—”Y’all come back nah, ya hear?” But in New Orleans, we have southern—not exactly hillbilly—charm. Still, it was laid back and entertaining.

The director called for the musicians. Suddenly the RV was empty. The nice, relaxed gentlemen who were so entertaining [turned out to be] the band, Journey. Immediately I was nervous and also thankful for living a life of bliss—it can save a shy person. Oh, one band member, Steve Perry, pretty much stayed to himself in his (the band’s) RV. The rest of the band continued to use our RV. I have pictures from that day and an autographed album and Steve Smith’s drumsticks, which were given to Chuck.



The second day of the shoot was perfect New Orleans weather. A touch of spring for the Mardi Gras season. I remember the band appearing later than was expected and seemingly confused. They [had gone] out the night before. What they couldn’t understand was why no one ever said “Last call!” Being a New Orleans girl, I couldn’t understand what a last call even was. They explained they were out all night because normal cities close bars and let everyone know that they are closing. But this was New Orleans, and Mardi Gras.


I couldn’t even imagine wearing my hair that way—the video was the first and last time I did. Makeup artists are just that, artists. I really appreciated her talents to enhance not just my looks but also that great time period, the ‘80s! She picked out the outfit in a local store in the French Quarter.


My boyfriend (unlike me, not clueless) bought their new album and brought it to the shoot. His brother-in-law (also not clueless) brought a camera, too [which is where these set photos come from].

How was it to work with Journey?

Everyone in the band was professional and did a great shoot that day. Steve was still reserved and quiet. I didn’t think anything of it; in fact, I thought I was the same way, so it seemed normal. It wasn’t until many years later that I learned of his girlfriend being upset that a girl was in a Journey video.



The rest of the band gladly offered their personal stories, shared photos, and enjoyed being in New Orleans. I rarely spoke, but I did talk to Jonathan Cain. Once again, I was oblivious—didn’t realize he was in one of my all-time favorite bands, The Babys, or I might have never gone near him. (I still listen to their music!)

Were you already familiar with Journey’s music?

I knew the Journey hits and loved their music. However, videos were new novelties so I didn’t know band members like we do now from videos.

Any funny anecdotes from the shoot?

When the shoot went a little longer than expected, I was running late to meet my boyfriend at his sister’s apartment, so I jumped in my car with full makeup and large ‘80s hair. It was important not to be late or I wouldn’t have parking for Endymion, one of the largest parades of the season. Luckily we had ladders set up behind the crowd to be able to see the parade. We had perfect viewing. Then the riders on each float started pointing at us, throwing beads as far as they could, bombing us as each float came by. My hair and makeup were the perfect bead magnets. It was one of the funniest times in my life and one of my best memories.



What did your parents think of the video?

My parents, God bless them, were older when the video was made. They weren’t up to date on pop culture—like knowing what MTV was or what music videos were. They didn’t seem surprised that I would be in a music video mainly for that fact. Funny, but my own children are likely to say the same about me.

What did your friends think of it?

My friends and family were supportive and, of course, happy to say they knew the “girl in the Journey video.”

Did the video generate any controversy that you know of?

If there was any controversy, the band made sure I was not a part.

Did you watch the MTV World Premiere of the video, and if so, how did that feel?

I did watch [it]. I was with friends who were in Chuck’s band at the time. We were so excited we even taped it on the Betamax!



I also watched Marilyn McCoo introduce it on Solid Gold. I have tried and tried to get the tape of when it was on Beavis & Butthead. I think that episode made me really think this video surpasses all others and is a true icon. That was the defining moment.

Were you ever recognized in public? How often and when last? Any stories about that?

I haven’t been recognized in public outright. To illustrate, about a year ago, our oldest daughter was presented as a Maid in the court of Neptune. An ‘80s cover band, equipped with videos, played “Separate Ways” at the ball. My daughter and I had the best time dancing and walking and laughing and being in the spotlight during that song! My husband thought the band should know that I was the girl in the video they just played and brought me backstage. For whatever reason, the band lacked enthusiasm. They were, however, polite enough to say that I did look like the girl in the video, especially around the eyes.

What are you doing these days?

I’m very proud and happy that Chuck and I married at the ripe age of 21 (about a year after the video was made). I am super thankful to say I am married to my best friend and sweetheart. We met when we were thirteen, then dated through high school and college. When Chuck got down on his knee to propose, he made sure a Journey song was playing.




I am the proud mother of our four beautiful children. They are Chase (25), who is attending MSU and completing [a degree in] broadcast meteorology; Madeline (21), who is attending Belmont University and studying music business/math while songwriting and recording music; Laina (14), who is entering 9th grade at St. Patrick Catholic High School; and Briggs (9), who is entering 4th grade at St. James Elementary School. I am blessed to be able to be at home raising them and enjoying every moment! I enjoy, and have to laugh, when I’ve been running around all day in sweats and a T-shirt, then I bring Briggs to his guitar lesson and the guy in the music store wants to know “What was it like to meet Journey?”

What do your kids think of the video?

I guess this video stands the test of time. My children are not embarrassed. In fact, they and their friends are impressed. [By] text I get pictures and videos from their friends singing “Separate Ways” to the video while they are out, and at any time of day or night. I love that! Their happiness is priceless.



Where do you live?

We live on the Mississippi Gulf Coast. Yes, we met Katrina up [close] and personally; she destroyed our home on the beach.

There were many miracles during that time. One, I guess you can say, is that one wall of our home survived the storm’s surge. We returned to survey the damages, and still hanging [on] this wall was the framed, autographed Journey album. It still has the remnants of the marsh and is proudly displayed in my husband’s office. The drumsticks, sadly, are now a part of Katrina’s collection. Luckily, I placed most of our photos upstairs in a container, and I also have pictures taken during the video. Journey came to Biloxi, MS not long after the storm. After the performance, I gave a roadie a picture taken during the [video] shoot. I asked him if he could get the band to sign it. He brought it back to me with thoughtful comments and autographs! That is all the contact I have ever had with Journey since the video.

What did you think when you first heard from me?

Lately the attention I receive from the video has grown. I get random questions about it, stories from friends when they tell other people they know me, and a lot of attention from my children’s friends. I mostly hear “How cool!” Still, even with this attention, I was so shocked to get your request to answer some questions!

Has anyone else ever interviewed you about this? Have you appeared at any fan conventions to sign autographs? If not, would you?

I haven’t been interviewed, other than curious friends asking what it was like to be a part of it. I haven’t been to any conventions, either.

How do you look back on the experience?

I most appreciate the fact that while making the video, the band was especially nice to me. They were all easygoing. I think they truly respected each other. I guess they are genuine, thoughtful people who also have talent beyond belief. Steve Smith seemed to like having a fan who was also a drummer (Chuck) on the set.



Janet Cross (who appeared in Huey Lewis and the News’s “If This Is It” video) is related to Frederick Law Olmsted (designer of Central Park). Are you?

I no longer have my father’s research (Katrina) but he claimed Frederick Law Olmsted was my great-great uncle (?). The Olmsted family tree is gigantic so it’s possible [Janet Cross, AKA Janet Olmsted Cross] and I are distantly related, but it would take some effort to know for sure. Small world! I probably get asked about my famous relative and my connection to him more than I get asked about the Journey video though.

Anything you’d like to add?

Another recent story about this band’s heart and soul is that Neal Schon gave his guitar to a boy in the front row of a Journey concert in New Orleans. This boy loves guitar and was playing air guitar along with Neal during the concert. The cool thing is, that boy not only loves Journey…but his cousin is married to the girl in the video. I would just love for Neal Schon to know this story and how happy he made our little cousin!

Thanks for your interest. I can’t help but smile while thinking someone is actually curious about little ol’ me! I am glad to help you, and as a dear family friend and second mother to me says, “We help each other.”

BONUS: What happened to Sherrie Swafford? 









Sherrie was the girlfriend of Steve Perry, classic lead singer of Journey, and the inspiration for the 1984 hit “Oh Sherrie.” She also appeared in the video and, if you ask me, she emanates sincerity.


Tuesday, May 3, 2016

Some Rare Fine Guitars

A collectible instrument is carefully constructed of high-quality material. This does not mean that it must be fancy. Quality of construction can be judged by neatness, excellence of finish, careful joints, good glue seams, properly proportioned bracing, accurate fret scale, good dimensions and symmetry, among other things. Elaborate inlay work and fancy binding do not necessarily indicate a good instrument, and in general, a poor instrument, even with beautiful trim, will not interest the collector.
As a corollary to high quality construction, a collectible instrument should be physically comfortable to play. At the very least, it should be possible to set it up in good playing order with minimal adjustment.
Another result of good craftsmanship is that most collector’s items do sound good. If they didn’t, they would have value only to art or antique dealers. The ultimate goal of a master craftsman is to produce an instrument that plays well and sounds good, not something that has a good appearance alone.
Many, but by no means all, collector’s item instruments are quite beautiful, especially some pre-World War II acoustic guitars, banjos, and mandolins with elaborate carving, inlays, and trims. Some of these models, by virtue of their beauty and artistic appeal, command very high prices. However, I would like to stress that the ornamentation has been added to instruments that were already of very good quality. There were many guitars with a lot of pearl trim made in the early part of this century that are not valued by collectors because they were of inferior construction. In future months, we will study specific makes and models to determine what features make them the quality pieces they are.
Rarity
Most collector’s items are out or production, and are readily distinguishable from current models. However, the fact that a model has been discontinued does not make it desirable, nor does rarity alone. Some instruments are discontinued for the understandable reason that they aren’t very good, and no one wants them. When a good instrument is rare, it is also often collectible. Since it is no longer made, money alone won’t buy a collectible guitar; first you have to find one. With some models, this can take years. With a new guitar, it’s possible to buy one in any music store, or at least to order it and know that it’s coming. You can be sure that it will be in good condition when it arrives. With an older guitar, however you nave no such assurance. Nor do you know for sure whether the guitar is what the seller says it is, since forgeries in the vintage instrument business are fairly common. Most “Pre-war F-5” mandolins, for example, are copies, and it is safe to say that 99.9% of the banjos that look like pre-war Gibson Flatheads are either conversions or assembled from Darts. Finding an original piece in good condition is exceedingly difficult.
In the past, the demand for fretted instruments was not as great as it is now. Before World War II, none or the companies were producing instruments in the quantities they are today. Even in later years, some models were manufactured in very limited quantities, such as the Explorer and the Flying V, and are consequently very rare. Not only were instruments produced in smaller quantities but the older an instrument is, the greater the odds are that it will have been lost to fire or flood, damaged beyond repair, “customized” with a poor refinish, inappropriate inlays, or removal of the pickups, badly repaired, or abused. Every year that passes increases the chance that an instrument will not survive intact. I should say, however, that age in itself does not make something valuable. A guitar that was a student model junker at the turn of the century is likely to still be trash today.
There are some pieces that, by virtue of their great historical appeal, extreme oddity, or abundant ornamentation, may be outstanding additions to a collection and yet be of little or no practical use to a professional musician. In these cases, the market is dominated by the collector rather than by the musician. I should stress that all of these instruments are the products of master builders. The rarest and fanciest instrument by an incompetent craftsman is worthless. A highly ornamented, one-of-a-kind piece by a famous maker, on the other hand, will bring an enormous amount of money, often more than is warranted by the instrument’s tone and playability .
The rarity of a model on the market is not determined by the absolute numbers made, but by how many potential buyers there are or each instrument. For example, Gibson made thousands of Les Pauls, but there are hundreds of thousands of people who want them. Even though the sunburst Les Paul might be more common than a Super 400 of equivalent age, it brings more on today’s market because of the great demand. What I have termed rarity, therefore, is largely a function of supply and demand.


If you have the love of vintage guitars, and a lot of cash to burn, then these five guitars might be just the ones you need. But remember Joe’s sage advice: even extremely valuable vintage guitars are meant to be played:

1. 1958 – 1959 GIBSON EXPLORER “KORINA”

The Gibson Explorer made its debut in 1958. It was a radically re-imagined guitar, designed to represent the dawn of the “space age”. It was science fiction meets guitar rock, and was released the same year as the Flying V, another avant-garde design from Gibson. Commercially, the Explorer was a failure, and Gibson stopped manufacturing the beleaguered product in 1963. My my my, how things have changed. Today, the Gibson Explorers produced between 1958 – 1960 have become some of the most sought after and expensive collectible guitars on the market.
1958 Gibson Explorer

2. 1958 – 1960 GIBSON LES PAUL STANDARD

The holy grail of guitar collecting. Like the Gibson Explorer, the Les Paul Standard, with its maple top and sunburst finish, was not initially a hit. However, the release of the legendary John Mayall and the Bluesbreakers featuring Eric Clapton changed all that, thanks to the man who would become known throughout the music world as “god”. Its cache increased further when American blues rocker Michael Bloomfield began playing one. Other Les Paul players include Duane Allman, Paul Kossoff, Jeff Beck, and Joe Bonamassa. Though Gibson manufactured Les Pauls since 1952, it’s the models from 1958 – 1960 when the sunburst finish was introduced that are most coveted.
1958 Gibson Les Paul Standard sunburst
6. 1931-’36 Martin D-28 
($140,000 to $170,000)
Though not as fancy as the D-45, its $100 price tag still put it mostly out of reach in the midst of the Great Depression. Thus, production stayed low.
7. 1928-’42 Martin 000-45
($93,000 to $160,000)
One of the models that mark evolutionary changes at Martin, with the advent of bracing for steel strings in ’28, values jump. In ’34, Martin transitioned it to a 14-fret, creating the version preferred by collectors.